What Lead Engineers Actually Do
Curiosity & fundamentals
Independence & ownership
Architecture & leadership
Strategy & org impact
Lead Engineers sit at the intersection of individual contribution and technical leadership. They're senior engineers who also guide team direction, mentor others, and ensure technical quality. The role requires both strong technical skills and the ability to multiply team effectiveness.
Core Responsibilities
Technical Direction:
Lead Engineers set technical standards for their team—architecture decisions, coding patterns, technology choices. They're the technical voice that guides team direction.
Code Contribution:
Unlike Engineering Managers, Lead Engineers continue to write significant code. They tackle complex problems, build critical features, and stay hands-on with the codebase.
Mentorship:
Lead Engineers grow team members. They review code thoughtfully, pair on difficult problems, and help engineers develop their skills.
Coordination:
They align technical work across the team—breaking down projects, managing technical dependencies, and ensuring coherent architecture.
Quality:
Lead Engineers own technical quality—code review standards, testing practices, and engineering excellence.
Lead vs Senior vs Manager
Understanding where Lead fits in the engineering ladder helps with hiring:
| Aspect | Senior Engineer | Lead Engineer | Engineering Manager |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary focus | Individual delivery | Technical leadership | People & process |
| Coding time | 80-100% | 50-80% | 0-30% |
| Direct reports | None | 0-3 sometimes | 5-10 typically |
| Scope | Feature/component | Team/system | Team/organization |
| Career track | Technical IC | Technical IC | Management |
Common Role Variations
Pure Technical Lead:
No direct reports. Focuses entirely on technical direction while coding significantly. Best for engineers who want leadership impact without management responsibilities.
Lead with Light Management:
1-3 direct reports with some 1:1s and career development. Still primarily technical. Common in smaller companies.
Team Lead:
Full team responsibility including people management. Less coding, more coordination. Often a stepping stone to Engineering Manager.
Be explicit about which you need. "Lead Engineer" means different things at different companies.
Skills Assessment for Lead Engineers
Technical Skills (Foundation)
Lead Engineers must be strong Senior Engineers first:
- Architecture & Design: Can make sound technical decisions for the team
- Coding: Still produces high-quality code efficiently
- System Thinking: Understands how components interact
- Technical Debt Management: Balances speed with sustainability
Leadership Skills (Differentiator)
Technical skills get candidates in the door; leadership skills distinguish Leads:
- Mentoring: Can teach and grow other engineers
- Communication: Explains technical decisions clearly
- Influence: Guides without formal authority
- Prioritization: Balances competing technical concerns
- Delegation: Empowers others rather than doing everything
Interview Evaluation
Technical:
- System design interviews at senior+ level
- Code review evaluation (give them code to review)
- Architecture decision discussion
Leadership:
- "How do you balance your own coding with supporting your team?"
- "Tell me about a time you mentored someone through a difficult problem"
- "How do you handle disagreement on technical decisions?"
Common Lead Engineer Hiring Mistakes
Mistake 1: Promoting Without Leadership Assessment
Why it's wrong: Great Senior Engineers aren't automatically good Leads. Technical skill doesn't guarantee leadership ability.
Better approach: Evaluate leadership skills specifically. Ask about mentoring, communication, and guiding others—not just technical achievement.
Mistake 2: Unclear Role Definition
Why it's wrong: "Lead Engineer" means different things at different companies. Candidates may expect more coding or more leadership than you intend.
Better approach: Be explicit about coding percentage, direct reports (if any), and scope of technical authority.
Mistake 3: Lead Title Without Authority
Why it's wrong: Giving someone a Lead title without authority to make technical decisions frustrates talented engineers.
Better approach: Ensure Leads have real technical decision-making power within their scope.
What Makes Lead Engineers Effective
The Multiplier Effect
Great Lead Engineers multiply team output rather than just adding their own contributions. They do this through:
Unblocking Others:
Leads prioritize removing obstacles for team members over their own coding. When a junior engineer is stuck, the Lead helps them through it rather than taking over the work.
Setting Technical Direction:
Clear technical direction reduces decision fatigue for the team. Leads establish patterns, make architecture decisions, and create consistency that lets everyone move faster.
Raising the Bar:
Through code review, pairing, and mentorship, Leads gradually elevate the entire team's capabilities. The best Leads make everyone around them better engineers.
Balancing Coding and Leading
The right balance depends on team size and needs:
Small Teams (3-5 engineers):
Leads may code 70-80% of the time. With fewer people to support, more time goes to individual contribution.
Medium Teams (6-10 engineers):
Leads typically code 50-60% of the time. More coordination, mentorship, and cross-team communication is needed.
Large Teams (10+ engineers):
Leads may code only 40-50% of the time. At this scale, the multiplier effect of leadership outweighs individual coding contribution.
Evaluating Lead Engineer Candidates
Technical Assessment
Lead candidates should pass senior-level technical assessments:
- System design at appropriate complexity
- Code quality and problem-solving
- Architecture decision-making
- Technical communication
But technical skills are table stakes—they get candidates in the door.
Leadership Assessment
The differentiator is leadership capability:
Mentorship Evidence:
"Tell me about someone you helped grow as an engineer."
- Look for specific examples with outcomes
- Understand their mentorship approach
- Assess patience and teaching ability
Influence Without Authority:
"How do you get buy-in for technical decisions?"
- Look for collaborative approaches
- Assess ability to handle disagreement
- Understand how they build consensus
Prioritization and Delegation:
"How do you decide what to work on yourself vs. delegate?"
- Look for strategic thinking
- Assess ability to let go of interesting work
- Understand how they develop others through delegation
Reference Checks for Leads
Ask references specifically about leadership:
- "How did they help you grow?"
- "How did they handle technical disagreements?"
- "What was their impact beyond their own code?"
Developer Expectations
| Aspect | ✓ What They Expect | ✗ What Breaks Trust |
|---|---|---|
| Coding Time | →Clear on how much coding vs leading | ⚠Bait and switch on responsibilities |
| Authority | →Real technical decision power | ⚠Lead title without authority |