What Technical Product Managers Actually Do
Technical Product Managers own product outcomes for technically complex products. Their core responsibilities mirror traditional product managers—customer discovery, roadmap prioritization, stakeholder alignment, launch coordination—but the execution requires technical fluency at every step.
A typical TPM week might include: reviewing API design docs with engineers, analyzing usage metrics to identify adoption bottlenecks, writing technical specifications for a new feature, meeting with enterprise customers to understand integration requirements, and presenting roadmap trade-offs to leadership with both business and technical justifications.
A Day in the Life
Core TPM Responsibilities
Product Strategy & Roadmap
- Define product vision for technical products (APIs, platforms, developer tools)
- Prioritize features based on customer value, technical complexity, and strategic fit
- Make build-vs-buy decisions with full understanding of technical implications
- Balance platform investments against feature development
- Own success metrics and iterate based on data
Technical Translation
- Write detailed technical specifications that engineers can execute against
- Participate in architecture discussions and understand trade-off decisions
- Review technical designs and provide product perspective
- Translate customer needs into technical requirements without losing context
- Bridge communication between non-technical stakeholders and engineering
Customer & Market
- Conduct customer research with technically sophisticated users
- Understand competitive products at a technical level
- Gather integration requirements and API feedback
- Evaluate technical partnerships and ecosystem opportunities
- Present technical capabilities to customers and partners
Cross-Functional Leadership
- Partner with engineering on estimation and planning
- Coordinate with DevRel, documentation, and support teams
- Align with sales and marketing on technical positioning
- Work with security and compliance on requirements
- Represent product perspective in engineering leadership discussions
Technical PM vs. Product Manager vs. Engineering Manager
This is one of the most common sources of confusion. All three roles work closely with engineering, but they own different outcomes and require different skills.
Product Manager (PM)
Product Managers own business outcomes. They decide what to build based on customer needs, market opportunity, and company strategy. PMs don't need deep technical knowledge—they work with engineering to understand feasibility and timelines, but they're not expected to evaluate technical approaches or write specifications at the implementation level.
PM focus: What should we build and why?
Technical Product Manager (TPM)
Technical Product Managers own business outcomes for technically complex products. They do everything a PM does but can also engage at the technical layer—evaluating architecture options, understanding system constraints, and communicating in engineering terms. TPMs are especially valuable for products where the customer is technical (developers, IT teams) or the product is inherently technical (APIs, infrastructure).
TPM focus: What should we build, why, and how (at a technical specification level)?
Engineering Manager (EM)
Engineering Managers own people and delivery outcomes. They're responsible for team health, hiring, performance management, and ensuring the team ships what product defines. EMs may be highly technical, but their primary job is people management, not product direction.
EM focus: Who builds it and how do we deliver it?
When You Need Each
| Scenario | PM | TPM | EM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer mobile app | ✅ | Overkill | ✅ |
| Developer API platform | Could work | ✅ Best fit | ✅ |
| Internal tooling | ✅ | Nice to have | ✅ |
| Infrastructure product | Struggles | ✅ Essential | ✅ |
| Enterprise B2B (technical buyers) | May need support | ✅ Strong fit | ✅ |
| E-commerce product | ✅ | Overkill | ✅ |
The Technical Depth Spectrum
Career Progression
Curiosity & fundamentals
Independence & ownership
Architecture & leadership
Strategy & org impact
Not all TPMs have the same level of technical depth. Understanding where on the spectrum you need someone helps target your search.
Former Engineers (High Technical Depth)
Profile: Started career as software engineers (3-7 years), transitioned to product. Can read code, understand system architecture, and have hands-on experience with the technical challenges their products address.
Best for:
- Developer tools and APIs
- Infrastructure and platform products
- Products where the primary user is an engineer
- Early-stage companies where TPM may need to prototype
Consideration: May over-index on technical elegance vs. business outcomes. Ensure they've developed genuine product management skills, not just technical opinions.
Technical-Adjacent PMs (Moderate Technical Depth)
Profile: Product managers who've worked extensively on technical products, often with CS education but limited professional engineering experience. Can engage in technical discussions, understand trade-offs, and write detailed specs—but wouldn't debug production code.
Best for:
- B2B SaaS products with technical buyers
- Platform products where understanding integrations matters
- Products at the intersection of technical and non-technical users
Consideration: The most common and often ideal TPM profile. Technical enough to be effective, product-minded enough to stay focused on outcomes.
PMs Who Leveled Up (Growing Technical Depth)
Profile: Strong product managers who deliberately developed technical skills—through courses, pairing with engineers, or working on increasingly technical products. May lack formal CS background but have built practical understanding.
Best for:
- Companies willing to invest in development
- Products where product instincts matter more than deep technical knowledge
- Teams with strong technical leadership that can support the TPM
Consideration: Can be excellent hires if they have genuine curiosity and learning ability. The gap is closeable; the product instincts are harder to develop.
Where to Find Technical Product Managers
Primary Sources
Developer Tools & API Companies
Companies like Stripe, Twilio, GitHub, Datadog, and Postman have entire product organizations built around technical products. Their PMs are, by necessity, technically sophisticated.
Platform/Infrastructure Teams at Large Tech
FAANG and similar companies have platform teams (AWS, GCP, Azure) where PMs work on deeply technical products. These folks understand developer experience and technical trade-offs.
Developer Relations Crossovers
Some Developer Advocates and DevRel professionals make excellent TPM candidates. They understand developers, can communicate technically, and often have product instincts from years of gathering feedback.
Senior Engineers Seeking Transition
Engineers at the senior/staff level who want broader impact sometimes consider product. They bring deep technical credibility but need genuine interest in the product side—not just a way to escape coding.
Where to Source
- Developer-focused communities (Hacker News, Dev.to, daily.dev)
- Product management communities with technical focus (Lenny's Newsletter, Product School)
- LinkedIn searches filtering for technical product titles
- API and developer conference speakers
- Open source project maintainers who've shown product thinking
- Referrals from your engineering team (they know who "gets it")
Red Flags in TPM Candidates
- Can't explain a technical concept simply (may not truly understand it)
- Only talks about technical work, never business outcomes
- Wants to be TPM to "stay close to engineering" (product work is the job)
- Can't give examples of influencing engineering without authority
- No evidence of customer empathy or user research
- Dismissive of non-technical stakeholders
- Technical opinions but no product framework for decisions
Assessment Challenges
Why TPM Interviews Are Tricky
Technical bar is ambiguous. How technical is "technical enough"? Too low, and they can't do the job. Too high, and you're hiring an engineer who wants a PM title.
Product skills may be underdeveloped. Former engineers sometimes struggle with the ambiguity, influence-without-authority, and customer empathy that product management requires.
Communication gaps appear later. A candidate who sounds technical in an interview may struggle to communicate with non-technical executives or customers.
Better Assessment Approaches
Technical Product Case Study
Present a realistic product scenario from your domain. Ask them to work through: customer needs, technical constraints, trade-offs, and a recommendation. Look for structured thinking that incorporates both product and technical considerations.
Spec Review Exercise
Show them a real (or realistic) technical specification or API design. Ask for feedback. Good TPMs spot product issues (unclear use cases, missing edge cases) alongside technical ones (scalability, security, developer experience).
Cross-Functional Simulation
Have them present a technical product decision to a mixed audience—one engineer, one non-technical stakeholder. Can they adjust their communication for different audiences while maintaining accuracy?
Technical Conversation (Not Coding)
Discuss system design or architecture at a conceptual level. You're not testing whether they can implement it—you're testing whether they can discuss it intelligently, ask good questions, and understand trade-offs.
Recruiter's Cheat Sheet
Resume Green Flags
- Product titles at developer tools / API / platform companies
- Engineering background followed by product transition
- Clear progression from PM to Senior PM to TPM
- Experience with technical products (APIs, SDKs, infrastructure)
- Mix of business metrics and technical accomplishments
- Computer Science degree (helpful but not required)
- Evidence of working with developers as users
Resume Yellow Flags
- "Technical PM" title without technical products in history
- Only consumer product experience applying for infra TPM role
- Engineering experience but no evidence of product work
- Vague claims like "worked with engineering teams"
- No metrics or business outcomes mentioned
- Only technical achievements, no customer or business focus
Questions to Ask in Initial Screen
- "Tell me about the most technical product you've worked on."
- "How do you typically work with engineers on technical specifications?"
- "Describe a time you had to make a technical trade-off decision."
- "Who was the user for your product, and what made them technically sophisticated?"
- "How do you stay current with technical trends relevant to your product?"
Technical Terms to Know
| Term | What It Means |
|---|---|
| API | Application Programming Interface—how software systems communicate |
| SDK | Software Development Kit—tools for developers to integrate a product |
| PRD | Product Requirements Document—what to build and why |
| Spec | Specification—detailed requirements, often technical |
| Technical debt | Shortcuts in code that create future maintenance burden |
| Developer experience (DX) | How easy/pleasant it is for developers to use a product |
| Platform | Foundational product that other products build on |
| Latency | Time delay in a system—critical for performance products |
| Scalability | Ability to handle increased load without breaking |
| Integration | Connecting two systems to work together |
Developer Expectations
| Aspect | ✓ What They Expect | ✗ What Breaks Trust |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Credibility | →Ability to engage in architecture discussions, understand system constraints, and earn engineering respect without needing to write code. | ⚠Expectation to code production features. Being excluded from technical discussions. Technical decisions made without TPM input. Engineering team that doesn't respect product perspective. |
| Product Ownership | →Real authority over product direction—roadmap, prioritization, trade-offs. Ability to say no to requests that don't align with product strategy. | ⚠TPM title without decision authority. Executives overriding product decisions. Engineering driving roadmap without product input. Being a "requirements translator" rather than product owner. |
| Technically Interesting Problems | →Products with genuine technical complexity—APIs, platforms, infrastructure, developer tools. Problems where technical depth actually matters. | ⚠Role positioned as TPM but product is straightforward consumer app. Technical skills underutilized. No opportunity to engage at the technical layer. |
| Strong Engineering Partnership | →Collaborative relationship with engineering leadership. Mutual respect for product and engineering perspectives. Clear decision rights. | ⚠Adversarial product/engineering relationship. Unclear authority between TPM and Tech Lead/EM. Engineering views product as "the business people." |
| Customer & User Access | →Direct access to customers and users—especially technical users. Ability to do discovery, gather feedback, and validate assumptions firsthand. | ⚠Customer access blocked by sales or account management. No budget for user research. Decisions made based on opinions rather than data. |