What MLOps Engineers Actually Do
MLOps Engineers are responsible for the infrastructure and tooling that enables data scientists and ML engineers to do their work efficiently and reliably.
A Day in the Life
ML Platform Development (Core Responsibility)
Building internal platforms that accelerate ML development across the organization:
- Training infrastructure — GPU clusters, distributed training setups, experiment orchestration (Kubeflow, Metaflow)
- Feature platforms — Feature stores (Feast, Tecton), feature engineering pipelines, feature versioning
- Experiment tracking — MLflow, Weights & Biases, or custom solutions for tracking experiments and artifacts
- Model registry — Centralized model storage, versioning, lineage tracking, approval workflows
- Data pipelines — ETL/ELT for ML, data quality checks, schema validation, drift detection
CI/CD for Machine Learning
ML CI/CD is fundamentally different from traditional software—MLOps Engineers design these specialized pipelines:
- Model testing — Unit tests for preprocessing, integration tests for pipelines, model validation gates
- Data testing — Schema validation, distribution checks, drift detection, data quality monitoring
- Automated retraining — Trigger-based retraining pipelines, champion-challenger deployment patterns
- Reproducibility — Environment management, dependency versioning, seed control, artifact immutability
- Deployment automation — Canary releases for models, A/B testing infrastructure, rollback mechanisms
Infrastructure & Cost Management
ML workloads are expensive and resource-intensive:
- Compute optimization — GPU utilization, spot instance management, cluster autoscaling
- Cost monitoring — Training cost attribution, serving cost analysis, optimization recommendations
- Resource scheduling — Fair scheduling across teams, priority queues, preemption policies
- Multi-cloud strategy — Cloud provider selection, hybrid deployments, avoiding vendor lock-in
MLOps vs. ML Engineer vs. Data Engineer
Understanding the distinction prevents hiring mistakes:
MLOps Engineer
- Focus: ML infrastructure, platforms, pipelines
- Builds: Training platforms, feature stores, model registries
- Success metrics: Platform reliability, developer productivity, cost efficiency
- Reports to: Platform/Infrastructure team or ML leadership
ML Engineer
- Focus: Model deployment, serving, production ML systems
- Builds: Prediction APIs, inference optimization, model monitoring
- Success metrics: Model latency, uptime, prediction quality
- Reports to: Product team or ML team
Data Engineer
- Focus: Data infrastructure, warehousing, ETL
- Builds: Data pipelines, warehouses, streaming systems
- Success metrics: Data quality, pipeline reliability, query performance
- Reports to: Data team or Engineering
The overlap: All three roles touch data pipelines. MLOps builds ML-specific pipelines (training data, features). Data Engineers build general data infrastructure. ML Engineers consume both to serve models.
Skill Levels: What to Expect
Career Progression
Curiosity & fundamentals
Independence & ownership
Architecture & leadership
Strategy & org impact
Junior MLOps Engineer (0-2 years)
- Maintains existing ML pipelines and infrastructure
- Writes basic Airflow DAGs and Kubernetes manifests
- Monitors ML platform health using existing dashboards
- Debugs pipeline failures with guidance
- Documents processes and runbooks
Mid-Level MLOps Engineer (2-5 years)
- Designs ML pipelines for new use cases
- Implements feature engineering platforms
- Optimizes training costs and GPU utilization
- Handles production incidents independently
- Evaluates and integrates new MLOps tools
- Mentors juniors on infrastructure practices
Senior MLOps Engineer (5+ years)
- Architects ML platforms that scale across teams
- Drives build vs. buy decisions for ML infrastructure
- Sets MLOps standards and best practices
- Influences vendor selection and technical roadmap
- Collaborates with leadership on ML strategy
- Handles complex, cross-team technical challenges
The MLOps Stack: What to Evaluate
Data & Feature Layer
- Feature stores: Feast, Tecton, Hopsworks, or custom solutions
- Data versioning: DVC, Delta Lake, lakeFS
- Data quality: Great Expectations, dbt tests, Monte Carlo
Training & Experimentation
- Orchestration: Kubeflow, Metaflow, Prefect, Dagster
- Experiment tracking: MLflow, Weights & Biases, Neptune
- Distributed training: Ray, Horovod, SageMaker
Model Management
- Model registry: MLflow, Vertex AI, SageMaker
- Model serving: Seldon, KServe, TensorFlow Serving, Triton
- Monitoring: Evidently, Fiddler, WhyLabs
Infrastructure
- Compute: Kubernetes, Kubeflow, cloud GPU services
- Cost management: Kubecost, cloud cost tools
- Observability: Prometheus, Grafana, DataDog
Interview Framework
Technical Assessment Areas
- Infrastructure design — "Design an ML training platform for 50 data scientists"
- Pipeline debugging — "A training job that worked yesterday now fails—walk through debugging"
- Feature engineering — "How would you ensure feature consistency between training and serving?"
- Cost optimization — "Training costs increased 3x last quarter. How do you investigate?"
- Drift detection — "How do you detect and respond to data drift in production?"
Red Flags
- Can't explain why feature stores matter
- No experience with GPU workloads or distributed training
- Treats ML infrastructure like regular infrastructure
- Doesn't understand reproducibility challenges
- Never dealt with model versioning or lineage
Green Flags
- Has war stories about ML pipeline failures
- Understands the full ML lifecycle
- Can discuss trade-offs between MLOps tools
- Experience with feature engineering at scale
- Proactively thinks about cost and reproducibility
Market Compensation (2026)
| Level | US (Overall) | SF/NYC | Remote |
|---|---|---|---|
| Junior | $110K-$140K | $130K-$160K | $100K-$130K |
| Mid | $140K-$180K | $160K-$200K | $130K-$170K |
| Senior | $160K-$220K | $200K-$260K | $150K-$210K |
| Staff | $200K-$280K | $250K-$350K | $180K-$260K |
Premium areas: Feature store experience, Kubernetes/GPU expertise, FAANG ML platform experience.
When to Hire MLOps Engineers
Signals You Need MLOps
- Data scientists waiting days for training jobs
- ML models failing in production with no clear diagnosis
- No reproducibility—can't recreate last month's model
- Feature engineering duplicated across projects
- Training costs growing faster than models
Team Size Guidelines
- 1-3 ML practitioners: DevOps can handle basics, maybe 1 MLOps
- 4-10 ML practitioners: 1-2 dedicated MLOps Engineers
- 10+ ML practitioners: MLOps team with platform specializations
Alternative Approaches
- Managed services: Vertex AI, SageMaker can defer MLOps hiring
- Platform companies: Weights & Biases, Tecton reduce custom work
- ML Engineers stretch: Senior ML Engineers can cover basics initially